Ulterior Motives

Global warming is hyped with no concern for rationality including evidence or explanations. The supposed solutions always do the opposite of the claims, as science eventually shows through studies. The agitators cannot be told or reasoned with.

This situation is how ulterior motives are promoted through a fake cause. The motive with global warming is to reduce the population of the globe to one tenth what it is by destroying the lower classes.

A few years ago, population control would always be tied to the subject of global warming. For example, a show on PBS dwelt on tailpipe emissions in Los Angeles and Denver. At the end, the cameras went to Africa and showed people lying on the floor of a shack. The narrator said, “This is a hospital. It was built for 100 people, and it contains 200.” End of program. Supposedly, Los Angeles and Denver are being polluted because of too many people in Africa.

Irrationality

The public is not getting information on the cause of global warming. Showing that ice is melting is a no-brainer; it does not mean humans are the cause.

To question human causation results in subjective attack, ridicule, name calling, personal smears, jeers and scandal, where there should be rationality, explanations, evidence and objectivity. This is how global warming hype is forced onto everyone, where there needs to be information and evidence.

The reason why you haven't before seen the material described here is not because I'm imagining it or that other scientists haven't been saying the same thing; it's because you've been robbed of the right to know by those who reduce social standards to a level which does not inform.

In the simplest possible terms, explanations would allow truth to be determined, but frauds never explain. You just have to take their word for it. You can never question their word, because they supposedly represent authority.

Authoritarianism

Authoritarianism is one of the main elements of irrationality. The only basis for the global warming claims which the public gets is that all relevant authorities say so—no explanation and no proof. Authority is so unquestionable that explanations are not needed with authoritarianism.

It is not only untrue that all relevant authorities agree with the propaganda, there is no place in science for consensus. Global warming is one of the most complex subject ever studied by science in a major way. The first thing this means is that consensus is not relevant to the question. But consensus is not relevant to anything in science, let alone the subject which has the most unknowns.

Example with Clovis Point

An example is "The Clovis Point," which was a rerun program on Nova recently. Scientists were totally convinced that the first Americans came from Asia 13,000 years ago, while there was a land bridge. As conflicting evidence started to appear, scientists ridiculed the investigators. The alternative evidence had to be acquired in secrecy due to the intimidation. Eventually, the assumptions were changed, and scientists now agree that humans have been in the Americas much longer than previously assumed.

Opposition to global warming consensus is of a similar nature. A decade ago, many scientists would openly say they do not find that humans are causing global warming. Nowdays, they are afraid to say so due to the extreme reaction which results. So there are fewer voices opposing the consensus view, while proponents claim there is no significant opposition.

Population Control

The hard core population controllers intend to reduce the population of the globe to one tenth what it is. That's not something that can be achieved through birth control; it requires starvation, disease, wars and oppression.

My view is that the planet could sustain 50 billion people easier than it is sustaining 6, if resources were developed instead of squandered. But population controllers do not want to develop resources, because it would result in population increase. So they squander resources to reduce the population to conserve resources.

Population controllers don't try to be rational, because the real motive is in subconscious forces which drive them to fight a war against the lower classes. Power mongering creates stimulus-response reactions in subconscious minds aligned upon the assumption that power is virtue and powerlessness is corruption. Power is the positive reinforcement, which makes corruption seem good, about like Pavlov's dog would have felt that bell sounds are good.

The Fraud and Morality of it.

The general public has to decide what to believe on a moral basis. Correct science has a moral basis. Deciding who to believe is a moral judgment. Honest persons proceeding in an honest way need to be relied upon rather than dishonest persons proceeding in a dishonest way. It's like someone going into a bank with a ski mask and a gun. It's not the proper way to withdraw money from a bank. Fraud doesn't look like honesty. Honest persons describe rather than impose. They give people information which can be compared to other information to create a gradual and continuous increase in understanding.

Global warming is promoted by persons who have never taken a significant science course in their lives, but claim to be representing peer reviewed science, because authorities said so through the IPCC reports. That's like withdrawing money from a bank at the point of a gun.

Even within science, there is no scientific description of a mechanism for carbon dioxide creating global warming. The only basis is a black box analysis through computer models. If an actual mechanism were described, critics could determine if it were correct. But there is nothing to study or criticize besides implications. That's not real science.

The implications tell the public that carbon dioxide is like a greenhouse trapping heat. There is no such scientific mechanism. If carbon dioxide absorbs radiation, that doesn't say how absorption of radiation heats the globe. Evading the specifics which can be studied and criticized is fraud.

Why the Fraud is not being Corrected