Wars aren't a mathematical error that can be corrected with an eraser. Wars are a standard of existence. Relativity is the same standard of existence.

People define themselves by their standards. What a person does says that he will always do something similar under similar circumstances. Redefining oneself requires a change in all elements of attitudes and values which determine how a person makes his decisions.

For these reasons it would be important to know what attitudes and values are and how to get properly aligned on a constructive path in life. That subject is too large and tangential for this proclamation, except to say that there is a general contempt for the subject.

The reason why this subject is about Einstein is because he represents the most definitive example of the corruption of the social order. Murderers don't define the social order; Einstein does. He is generally worshipped; and ABC selected him as the "man of the century." Yet the result which he represents is an inversion of truth in the most basic laws of nature.

Imposing a mockery onto society in contempt for truth and rationality is an ethic which says, "we are above truth and justice; our ability to stick our ass in your face and make you like it is our test of success and virtue." Imperialism is the same standard. Going to someone else's country and destroying it in the name of virtue is the same standard.

The significance of Einstein's relativity is in the perverse standard that it sets for society. There is little direct scientific significance to relativity, as it has no practical applications. But it is forced down peoples' throats, in science and out, as a standard based on a set of values and related attitudes.

There are basically only two sets of standards: right and wrong. There is an objective criterion for the difference. It is constructivity. Right is constructive; and wrong is destructive.

This means that the promotion of inverted standards is most effective where the inversion is most extreme. Relativity is one of the most extreme inversions of truth possible, because it contradicts the most basic logic and all other laws of physics.

The starting point of relativity is the claim that the receiving point of light determines the velocity. Effect supposedly precedes cause. That claim is the most basic form of invalid logic. Rationalizers will say it's ok to have effect precede cause. This only shows how the standard is promoted as more than a question of science.

After logic is defied at the starting point of relativity, fakes claim that relativity is proven every day. There is no such thing as proof without logic. So they defy logic at the starting point and then apply logic to phony proofs. They admit that relativity is in contradiction to all of the rest of physics; and then they apply the rest of physics to phony proofs of relativity.

It is a truism that only persons with corrupt personal standards go down that path. Einstein was as incompetent and corrupt as scientists get. Everything Einstein did was plagiarized from physicists before him who rejected the concepts before Einstein promoted them. Before Einstein got into relativity, he was a reject in physics relegated to patent work. Did someone miss his ingeniousness? His change of fortune was not based upon scientific brilliance; it was based upon the ability of frauds to exploit his unprecedented gall. His initial claims were so ridiculous that they would have been viewed as a joke had they failed to be accepted.

Einstein's claims were initially rejected; but one by one, frauds forced the mockery down the throats of other scientists. Corrupters can do that, because it is much easier to corrupt complex realities than develop them through rationality. Also, frauds conspire to increase their power, while conspiracy does not enhance rationality, it degrades it. So all constructive persons function as individuals, while all frauds function as a large group. Frauds take over all sources of power which lack suitable accountability in that manner.

Allowing and promoting such frauds aligns the social standards on the use of force to overwhelm constructivity. With such a social standard, wars will be used to destroy vulnerable countries. It won't end until the social standards change.

How it Works Politically — by David Keen