The definition of energy was argued for 200 years but the wrong alternative was chosen. Now, rocket math can be applied to the original test, and it shows the error. The value of a rocket is that there are no complexities to mask the result.

This model, involving falling objects, was the original basis for the definition of kinetic energy.

Rockets are used to calculate force, which is independent of the definition of energy.

A 4kg object dropped 1m (meter) has the same amount of ½mv² as a 1kg object dropped 4m, because force times distance equals ½mv² for an accelerating mass. But a rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities requires twice as much energy as fuel for the large mass as for the small one.

Therefore, both masses do not have the same energy; the rocket does not transform energy in proportion to ½mv²; ½mv² is not kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel does not produce a consistent amount of ½mv².

A 4kg object dropped for 1s (second) has the same amount of mv (momentum) as a 1kg object dropped for 4s, because force times time equals mv for an accelerating mass. A rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities uses the same amount of energy as fuel for both masses.

Therefore, both masses have the same amount of energy; the rocket transforms energy in proportion to mv; mv is kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel produces a consistent amount of mv.

All logic and evidence of energy points to the same conclusion. The logic created the need to derive the mathematical proof.

About ninety percent of physics is corrupted by the error.

Concise Math


Why This is Proof

Physicists mindlessly assume the discrepancies can be accounted for in the exhaust of the rocket. There's no question where the energy is located. It's a question of defining energy in terms of transformation instead of nonsensical math. With ½mv², energy addition (including transformation) varies with reference frames, while addition of mv is independent of reference frames.

The proof shows that, when defining energy as ½mv², the exhaust energy of two rockets can be the same, while the transformation is not the same.

In tests 3 and 4 (Part 2), the rockets have the exact same burn times, while the ½mv² of one mass is 192, and the other is 770. One mass gets four times as much ½mv² as the other, while the rockets do exactly the same thing.

If the rocket and exhaust can do exactly the same thing in both cases and add four times as much supposed energy to the forward mass of one than the other, then the energy is not coming from the fuel or rocket motor; it is simply a mathematical equation with no relationship to laws of nature.

In other words, what I call proof is to show that the incorrect concept of energy has no relationship to fuel use. This should be considered proof in any rational mind.

The correct analysis is that the equal and opposite forces created in the combustion chamber transfer equal and opposite amounts of kinetic energy to the exhaust and forward mass. This is consistent with kinetic energy being proportional to force times time and mv.

What this proof shows is that the erroneous definition of energy separates energy addition from the transformation. Energy addition becomes a mathematical abstraction which changes with reference points and does not maintain a consistent relationship to the transformation which is supposed to be the source of the energy.

The corrected definition of energy maintains a consistent relationship to the transformation, because the transformation produces a consistent and definable amount of force times time. The transformation does not produce a consistent amount of force times distance.

The result of this mathematical proof is totally predictable, because force times time (Ft) does not equal ½mv² for an accelerating mass, and Ft is the only product of a rocket. The rocket produces a constant force, which means unchanging through time, while it has no relation to distance. When a rocket produces a definable amount of force times time, in proportion to fuel use, but does not produce a definable amount of force time distance, which has no relation to fuel use, this shows that energy is transformed in proportion to force times time, not force times distance.


Conceptualize the Transformation

The power varies infinitely with velocities or reference frames, while the (erroneous) equations stay balanced, because the power of the exhaust is subtracted from the power of the forward mass and always creates a constant power. But a finite rocket motor cannot add a huge amount of energy to the forward mass, nor can the exhaust subtract almost as much. In fact, there is no such thing as the exhaust subtracting power from the forward mass. Subtraction is a nonsensical mathematical manipulation which has no relationship to the transformation.


Philosophy

There is no complete proof of anything. If someone will not accept the obvious as fact, no one can force them to. Proof can only be spoken of as a figure of speech, which means accepting the obvious as fact.

The same situation exists with a large number of corruptions throughout science including almost all of physics. Complex math made physics more prone to corruption than biology. Relativity starts with the invalid claim that the receiving point of light determines its velocity. Effect precedes cause. That logic is never acceptable and should be proof of relativity being wrong. But not to physicists. They pretend that any logic can be defied, as long as they have equations which they can exploit. Physicists scoff at the need for logic; but then they use logic to justify and supposedly prove their claims. They contradict themselves in defying the logic which shows their errors while using logic to justify the errors.

At the basic level, physics can only function as super-engineering, not science, because it is permeated with errors. Engineering is vastly different from science. It uses replication of rudimentary procedures which can be derived through trial-and-error. It would be improved with basic knowledge, but it is only using superficial knowledge due to the corruption of physics.

Complete Math