The Bible uses sin and conspiracy as synonyms. The reason is because no one can stand on their own and defy the universe, which is what sin is. Instead, they get support from other corrupters, which is what conspiracy is.

The most significant thing about the conspiracies is that they destroy the need to be rational. Rationality is a survival mechanism. It tells people what to expect as a consequence of their actions. But conspiracies short-circuit the process of rationality by shifting the responsibility to someone else. If some higher influence defies the logic of a subject, they can be blamed for the consequences.

In other words, if each person had to decide for himself whether to sin, sin would have ended before it ever got started. But corrupters acquire and use power to control the sin of other persons.

The conspiracies all form in the spirit world. The bliss of total and instant communication is what makes conspiracies as certain as water flowing down hill. Nothing comparable can occur under material conditions, which is why critics of corruption are ridiculed as "conspiracy theorists." Supposedly, conspiracies are a fantasy, because there is no realistic way to pull it off. But replace the atheistic materialism with the truth about the spirit world, and conspiracies are the number one problem in the universe.

There are many groups of conspirators who collaborate and compete with each other in the control of sin. The fact that they have sin in common reinforces their assumptions that sin is necessary, if not a superior standard when compared to morality. How could all of those degenerates be wrong and one person right?

To understand how, a comparison to rationality is needed. Rationality is something a mind produces. It must begin with an individual effort. Destroy the individual efforts, including rights and freedoms of individuals, and rationality is not possible.

This is one of the primary things conspirators do—they destroy individual efforts. Everything must be done through group effort, so rationality does not create obstacles to the conspiracies.

For the same reason, there is a need for conspirators to homogenize the social order. Differences cannot be tolerated, because they result in conflicts with the conspiracies. More basically, all of morality conflicts with the conspiracies, and morality is largely an individual set of responsibilities.

The goal of conspirators is to pull one string to control everything. Does it sound absurd? That's how mindless conspirators are.