Fraudulent religion is always characterized by nonconstructivity which is rationalized through philosophy or theology. It is not correct religion unless people are more constructive as a result.

The primary frauds are the same in all religions. Sometimes (in Christianity), the frauds are concealed and denied. In some religions, the frauds are promoted more openly as supposed virtues.

One of the primary frauds is to teach people to be worthless. Supposedly, someone else takes care of everything. In Christian fundamentalism, to teach constructivity is supposedly a corruption, because people would then be trying to save themselves, and Paul said people might boast if they try to do good deeds (Eph 2:9).

In the spirituality and bliss religions of the eastern type, elements of constructivity are portrayed as too human, materialistic and debased to be promoted. The infinite something-or-other is too important to be degraded by such concerns as knowledge.

It's necessary to look at the results and the contradictions. The result in all cases is nonconstructive standards by the persons involved. Their insulated lives are portrayed as pious, but any contact with the normal world shows results which are closer to criminality.

Such claims might be viewed as argumentative; but there is a new method of demonstrating the truth. It's the internet and email. The culprits cannot produce constructive communication or respond to criticism.

Everyone has a responsibility to respond to criticism. It goes with the interdependent relationships people have. In other words, if someone is creating a problem, they have to explain themselves to critics. Corrupters pretend that criticizing them is some sort of crime, as if they had a right to promote fraud. But there is too much human and spiritual degradation that stems from the fraud to claim immunity from criticism.

The contradictions in the promotion of worthlessness are numerous. First, the culprits superficially pretend otherwise, which demonstrates that people are not supposed to be worthless. But the rationalizations are nothing but a glib sentence here and there for the purpose of covering their rears, while the details of their philosophy are designed to oppose the development of constructivity.

The philosophical effect is to claim that the purpose is to achieve some sort of spiritual bliss. The only alternative to constructivity is some sort of subjective gain such as eternal bliss. The primary fraud of that philosophy is that no one needs any training or religious activity to achieve an eternal bliss apart from constructivity. Everything in the spirit world is a bliss apart from destructivity. And usually, a divine being produces the bliss, while the peons do nothing (apart from being constructive).

Sometimes, a particular type of bliss is the goal, such as nirvana; and mind control is needed to achieve it. Evaluating the worth of nirvana is not the purpose here, but the side issue appears unavoidable. So I would say that such hard core meditation is nothing but a trick which allows demons and other destroyers to steal spirit substance from dupes who are stupid enough to offer up their minds.

But even if nirvana and other results of hard core meditation were a worthwhile goal, the absence of constructivity in achieving it is extremely visible in the persons involved and their philosophy. While they pretend to bleed over the widows and orphans, the real significance is in the fact that their nonconstructivity starts with, and is most visible in, their communication. They cannot communicate in a constructive manner. Communication has all of the elements of morality in it, and the corrupters don't have a clue as to what morality is supposed to be.

For example, all claims are supposed to have specifics and evidence which allows the truth to be determined. Corrupters omit the specifics and evidence, because they want to defy truth. They do this with the words in front of them, misrepresenting statements without clarifications. And they do the same with accusations, which could apply to the man in the moon due to their lack of specifics and evidence.

Consider what the basic problem is. Sin has basic reactions with it. Over time, corrupters develop mechnanisms for countering opposition, particularly the effects of truth. Subjective accusations are the slickest defense against truth and criticism. Valid criticism is countered with invalid accusations.

These mechanisms create a barrier to improvement. Corrupters cannot be corrected, and they do not respond to criticism in a constructive manner, because they have eons of bad habits developed to repel truth and constructivity. Their sham religious philosophies only protect their corruptions instead of overcome them.

So why does constructivity matter when leaving human life and entering eternal life in the spirit world? The answer is simple. It's the same reason as why constructivity matters in human life. Corrupters don't just live and let live. They have to be degrading others to show their dominance and satiating their jealousy, etc. They keep doing the same thing in the spirit world.

Buddhism and Nirvana
The Transcendence Fraud