There is one error above all others that separates the false theology of satan's from the theology of Christ's.

First, a context must be described. The theology of sin seems necessary, but it's not. It seems easy, but it creates endless problems. It is made to appear to be God's work, but it is a fraud. It has the purpose of promoting and justifying sin, while satan controls the result. The result is a destruction of souls.

The theology of Christ has the purpose of ending sin. It is a path that is hard to find and follow. It requires personal responsibilities. It is hated by corrupt persons and the world which satan controls. But it replaces spiritual death with eternal life.

Sin develops gradually in subconscious minds as a force (pride) which causes destructivity. Correcting the forces in subconscious minds is the only answer. God zapping the person won't fix it, because all surrounding realities in the mind control the result. A person must learn how to function and think properly through experience. The process takes time under constructive conditions.

Christ described the nature of sin and the conditions required to overcome it. People must learn to do things for victims of injustice as a method of correcting the reactions in their minds. A lot of knowledge is required. For that reason, Christ taught the basic principles of morality, and he said people are supposed to try to understand what he taught (Mat 15:10)(Mark 4:13, 7:14, 8:21)(Luke 24:45)(John 8:43).

In combating the external forces of sin, Christ taught that truth is the answer (John 8:32). The explanation is that sin cannot exist in the light of truth, as difficult as it is to develop adequate truth.

Of course, the fraud that satan teaches is the opposite. It says that sin is so easy to fix that any number of gimmicks will do it; and one over-all gimmick took care of sin on the cross.

If the basic procedure were to throw flowers in the mud, most persons would say something fishy is going on. What if the procedure were to kill people? What if it required killing your friends, particularly your children? What if it required offering their blood to God? That is what satan taught people for religion throughout human history. All sin is sacrificing the innocent for the benefit of the guitly.

When archeologists study the Aztecs and similar cultures of ancient America, they find that sacrificing children was the focus of their religion. The primitives would also sacrifice adults and warriors. There were gods who demanded that result as a payment for success or protection.

About four thousand years ago, a process was begun for correcting the errors of satan's fraud. It had to begin with small steps and gradually work toward increased understanding. It could not all be done at once. A group of persons were selected for the purpose. They were separated from the rest of the world by marching them through a desert for forty years. They were given ten of the most basic rules for right conduct; but of course, that wasn't enough. Christ was crucified for breaking the rules. There had to be enough basic knowledge to determine what morality is under all conditions; and teaching that subject was Christ's purpose (Mat 23:8).

One of the things Christ taught is that it is mercy God wants, not sacrifice (Mat 12:7). The universal practice of sacrifice could not be instantly removed from the early Jewish religion, because much time was needed to correct the errors. But the process of correcting the error was begun early on (Isaiah 1:11)(Jer 7:22)(Hosea 6:6)(Psalms 40:7, 50:8-15)(Mat 9:13, 12:7)(Mark 12:33).

For Paul to then drag the theology of sacrifice into Christianity was satanic. He claimed that murdering Christ was the gimmick which ended sin on the cross. Christ never said any such thing.

To say that Christ's crucifixion was atonement for sin was to say that the gods of satan who demanded human sacrifice throughout human history had a correct theology. It says that God's values and purposes are the same as those of the demons who were worshipped in pagan religions. It says that sin is the answer to problems. Everything Christ taught says the opposite.

The theology of sacrifice says that solutions to problems can be extracted from the blood of innocent persons. Christ taught that overcoming sin is the only path to life.

The motive and net effect of ritualistic sacrifice is to change the definition of morality. If destroying someone is not inately wrong, then the harm to the victim is not the determining factor of morality.

If the worst sin can be rationalized, then any other sin can be rationalized. So the persons who promote that standard rationalize their sin as being virtue, becuase it is done for noble purposes and in God's name.

Offering blood is a paganistic corruption. The demon gods required murder as a test of loyalty, and then they would provide some protection or something. It's like the Mafia requiring extortion money. When Christ referred to offering his blood, it was not payment to anyone. It was self-sacrifice for advancing truth. The same is true of martyrs or military soldiers. The Christian martyrs were not paying Nero to please him. The soldiers at the Battle of the Bulge were not paying Hitler to please him. God is not a pervert like the demons who required murder as a test of loyalty. Christ had to be martyred to prove the truth about sin, because corrupters claim sin is so trivial that nothing needs to be done about it. So Christ showed that innocent persons and moralists are being destroyed because of the characteristics of sin. When society murders God for doing good deeds and teaching morality, then the nature of sin is demonstrated. It is a major problem that requires a major effort to overcome it. It says Paul was not fixed with a flash of light. If he were, no religion would be needed. The fraud of his theology and his disgraceful communication standards demonstrate that he was not fixed by a flash of light.

Rationality in Religion
Paul Rewrote Christianity