Frauds use a four hundred year old Bible in their never ending quest to corrupt every word and molecule in life. Two facts about the KJV contribute to the fraud. One, the age puts it back in time before modern standards of accountability and rationality existed. Two, the language is nearly unintelligible and is easy to corrupt.

I'll show an example of bold faced lying in translation. But first, compare it to a properly produced Bible. The New American Bible was produced at the highest standard that can be achieved. For about twenty years, starting in the fifties, the Catholic Church harnessed the abilities of about two hundred of the highest scholars in the world to retranslate the entire Bible with all of the evaluation, criticism and accountability that could be applied to the task. The result has incomparable coherence and consistency with the entire meaning of the Bible based on Christ's words as the definitive authority.

The minute the NAB was in print, satan and his perverts went to work on it to corrupt the result. Every few years they would produce another butchery, crossing out words and phrases and replacing them with absurd mockeries.

This is the story of everything in life. While a complex task is being undertaken, satan gets shoved aside, because accountability and interacting realities strengthens the truth. But the minute the task is complete, satan and crew start replacing it with corruptions produced in their dark pit without accountability.

For these reasons, the first edition of the NAB is the most reliable source in existence. Later editions are garbage, and the KJV was never anything but a fraud.

An example of the fraud is Mathew 10:34. The NAB reads, "Do you suppose that my mission on earth is to spread peace. My mission is to spread, not peace, but division." The KJV reads, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." The word "division" was replaced by the word "sword" in the KJV.

If we look at the Greek form or the word in question, we find three variations, which are these:

machaira. It means division. The rationalization for the substitution with the word sword is visible in Strongs Concordance, which is based on the KJV. It says, "presumed derivation of mache; a knife, i.e.—war, judicial punishment:—sword."

mache. But mache is defined as, "from machomai; a battle, i.e. controversy:—fighting, strive, striving."

machomai. Then machomai is defined as, "---an apparent primary verb; to war, i.e. to quarrel, dispute:—fight, strive."

Notice that the original Greek means to fight, strive, quarrel, dispute or war. But for no reason beyond corruption, Strongs Concordance sticks in the word "knife" and then changes it again to the word "sword." The original Greek has nothing to do with any instruments of war, only the concept of conflict. The entire purpose was to replace Christ's reference to division to sword.

There is all the difference in the world between division and sword. Truth divides. It separates objective reality from falsehoods. Swords kill. The difference between producing truth and killing is the difference between the morality which creates life and the sin which destroys life. Christ said his entire purpose in appearing in human life was to testify to the truth (John 18:37), not to kill.

That's why frauds use a four hundred year old version of the Bible.