Morality is that which   
sustains life.  
   Christian Morality
  
 
HOME
 
The Basics
Definitions
What Sin Is
Morality Applied
Thomas Aquinas
Fundamentalism
Spirit World
Creationism
List
Gary Novak
  
 
             

Why Moral Philosophy
 

The world rejects knowledge. Knowledge should be easy to acquire, because one point builds upon another. You simply collect all of the related points of evidence on a subject.

Isn't that what everyone does? No. It's common to collect a lot of authoritative slogans which seem to be exploitable. But that's not what knowledge is.

Once knowledge exists, it shows where sin and ignorance are at. Corrupted persons, particularly authorities, can't stand to have their corruptions exposed that way, so they oppose knowledge. Then they teach the peons their standards of corruption. After all, doesn't everyone want to be gods like authorities? People must learn to sin like authorities, if they want to be gods like authorities.

In Buddhism (and other enlightenment religions), the opposition to knowledge is directly stated. Thought disrupts meditation, and knowledge promotes thought. You might think that knowledge could be acquired while not meditating. But when you try to improve the knowledge of Buddhists, they oppose the concept of developing knowledge. They say you are just supposed to experience enlightenment without questioning the process.

Supposedly, achievers of enlightenment acquire ultimate truth without knowledge. They claim they acquire truth intuitively. So you need to know about the dangers of intuition without knowledge. Do you believe satan exists? Intuition is how he got to be so shrewd.

All sin is promoted intuitively. Forces of corruption inside of minds are the source of all significant sin. Those forces cause corrupted persons to assume sin is the right thing to do. Knowledge would tell them otherwise.

In other words, intuition produces a lot of false knowledge. The world assumes it gets correct knowledge through intuition, but it's wrong, as usual. All biases and unwitting errors stem from intuition which produces false knowledge.

Correct knowledge is defined by the logic of relationships between realities. Knowledge is reality in the mind which properly represents objective, unified reality. Consistent relationships between realities make up unified reality.

Unified reality is the source of all life. So the test of truth and knowledge is whether realities are a part of unified reality. If realities conflict with unified reality, they are false realities, errors or lies.

So knowledge and truth are determined and studied by evaluating relationships between realities. Making relationships between realities is reason. It's strictest application is logic.

Opponents like to disagree with me on all points; and since nothing can be proven, they use authority as a basis of validity. Here's something close to proof that they promote corruption. It takes a process of reason to determine what truth and knowledge are. Quoting authorities is not the right process. They promote corruption by using an invalid process.

It's like making an automobile or toaster. Shoveling mud doesn't produce anything but mud. The process which is used for producing it determines whether it is an automobile or toaster.

Corrupted persons always use an invalid process for handling realities. They never use correct reason or logic by showing relationships between points of evidence. Using an invalid process, their claims are invalid.

Satan teaches corrupted standards to the world. The purpose here is to correct that corruption by describing the proper methods of handling realities and correcting the foundation of basic realities upon which all other realities reside. The basics are abstract, and therefore they are studied through the logic of their relationships.

These principles only apply to abstract realities. News is not abstract, so rationality doesn't apply to it. Of course, there is always a mixture of abstract and nonabstract realities, particularly with the propensities for spin and propaganda. My primary concern is with abstract basics, which requires a lot of relationships and context.
Home