Society is being overrun by totalitarian overwhelm. The carbon dioxide fraud shows that totalitarianism is not just a system of government; it's a social force generated by frauds who are driven by ulterior motives.

Fakery doesn't look anything like honesty. Fakes use tactics which are galling. It's like going into a bank with a ski mask and gun. The carbon dioxide fraud is promoted the way the Mafia would rob a bank, not the way honest persons develop a subject.

The number one difference between the two standards is the use of force. The force behind the carbon dioxide fraud is designed to be as overwhelming as possible. Opponents are attacked subjectively—ridiculing and calling names instead of explaining.

Force can only be defined philosophically as "that which opposes reality." It disallows or obliterates reality. You don't see a reality element to the carbon dioxide fraud, because it is promoted through force in conflict with reality.

Ask yourself, how do greenhouse gasses cause global warming? It's never been explained. Instead, your mind is manipulated in a propaganda manner with images of polar bears drowning, claims of oceans flooding cities and threats of diseases spreading. The supposed science is taken care of by computer models which even scientists do not have access to.

This conflict is not made up of two opposing views on the subject. It's a social force overwhelming an attempt to develop a subject. The fake science cannot be questioned, because the "tipping point" might occur if action is not taken without questioning why. Or the science might be unquestionable, because only a "denier" would question modern science. The science is said to be settled. Settled science means there is no reality on the subject, only a social force.

There are an awful lot of nonscientists promoting the global warming fraud. If the science is settled, and they would have no clue as to what it is anyway, what are they doing? They are trying to force something onto society in the absence of developed reality.

Promoters of the fraud claim they represent unquestionable authority. How can they represent something which they know nothing about? Why do we have to be told by idiots what they determined and we supposedly do not know? Why can't people determine for themselves what authority represents?

So what do the promoters add to the subject? What could they add besides a force? They don't even pretend to be developing the realities.

The underlying premise of the frauds is that creating a social force is a good thing. A social force is a totalitarian thing, not a good thing. A society that acts upon force in conflict with realities is a self-destructive society, as the Nazis demonstrated.